BATTLE OF EL ALAMIEN OF NORTH AFRICAN CAMPAIGN




General
The battle, which turned the tide in favour of the Allied forces in ‘North African Campaign’ is popularly known as the Battle of El Alamein, was fought between Allied 8th Army Commanded by General Montgomery and Axis forces (Panzer Armee Afrika) under Field Marshal Rommel. The battle was fought at El Alamien of northern Egypt from 23 October to 04 November 1942. In this battle the Axis forces were completely routed and their fighting power broken significantly in North Africa.
Figure-1: Military Battles- North African Campaign

Strategic Importance of North Africa
Geo-Strategic Importance of Egypt
Egypt sat like a spider in its’ web, at the center of a crucial geo-strategic networks that include the Eastern Mediterranean Sea, Abyssinia (invaded by the Italians in 1936 and liberated by the British in 1941), the Middle East and the Suez Canal.

Figure-2: Military Battles-Geo-Strategic Importance of Egypt

Prevent the German Concentration on the East European Front
After the German invasion of Russia in 1941, there was a strong case, military and political, for preventing the Germans from concentrating on the East European Front.

Figure-3: Military Battles-East European Front

Opening a Second Front at North Africa
The German forces invaded Russia on 22 June. Germans were stopped at Moscow at the same time of battle of Alam Halfa. Both Stalin and Churchill wanted to open a second front defeating the Axis forces at North Africa. It was evident that the Axis forces planned to conduct a big ‘Pincer Move’ to capture Persian Gulf region. This would result in reduction of Allied war effort by 25% due to fall of oil refineries to the Axis hand. This enabled the British and Americans to prepare for a massive amphibious operation called ‘OPERATION OVERLORD’.

Figure-4: Military Battles-Opening a Second Front at North Africa

Figure-5: Military Battles-Operation Overload

Depletion of Axis Land Forces
After the fall of France in 1940, the British and Commonwealth troops could not engage the Germans and Italians on land in any theatre. The humbling of Mussolini was an important objective in it’s own right.

Figure-6: Military Battles-Fall of France

Dominance over the Mediterranean Sea
If the Allies won North Africa they would have a better chance of holding the Mediterranean, which was the epicenter of the war.
Figure-7: Military Battles-Mediterranean Sea

Importance to Italians
Benito Mussolini began to worry that once the Axis powers had won the war he would have very little to use as bargaining chip when it came to territorial distribution. Thus he chose North Africa to initiate the campaigns against the British.
Probability of German-Japan Overland Connection
One of the fears of the Allies was that Japan would invade India and Germany would invade North Africa and thereafter, the two would meet somewhere in between, crippling Britons supply lines from India. As it turns out this was never a real threat, but it did cause occasional worry on the part of Churchill.
Figure-8: Military Battles-Probability of German-Japan Overland Connection

Description of the Battle Ground
The very location of Mediterranean Sea on its immediate north and Qattara Depression on its 40 miles south made El Alamein the only position secure against encirclement.
Figure-9: Military Battles-Qattara Depression

The Feature of Qattara is few thousand square miles in area, about 400 feet below sea level with about 800 feet steep cliff throughout its northern edge. This dried up inland sea is full of quick sand and salt marshes, impassable even for camels.
There were few ridges namely Ruwaisat, Alam Halfa, Tell el Eisa and Miteirya dominating the battle ground.
Figure-10: Military Battles-Description of the Battle Ground

Strategic Importance of El-Alamein
El Alamein is a railway station of North West Egypt, located 60 miles south west of Alexandria, having no strategic importance. But it had tactical values to both the forces.
The very location of Mediterranean Sea on its immediate north and Qattara Depression on its 40 miles south made El Alamein the only position secure against encirclement.
There was no suitable defense line after that to defend Egypt and the Suez Canal for the Allied.
The only coastal road and the railway line ran through the small villages of El Alamein.
Loss of El Alamein would have caused loss of Suez Canal with ultimate loss of oil refineries in Abadan, which would have reduced the British war effort by approximately 25%.
The strategic loss of Suez Canal would have cut off the shorter sea Line of Communication for the British to Burma and India.
Figure-11: Military Battles-Strategic Importance of El-Alamein

Background
Beginning of North African Campaign
On 10th June 1940 Italy joined Germany in Axis force that time she  had Libya at North Africa as her colony and Egypt on the east of Libya was British colony.

Figure-12: Military Battles-Beginning of North African Campaign

Advance of Italian Force
On 13 September 1940. Italian force started advance towards east and crossed the border. They advanced upto Sidi Barrani around 75 miles in Egypt and established themselves in a chain of fortified camps. Week after week they passed without any attempt to move on.

Figure-13: Military Battles-Advance of Italian Force

Advance of Allied Forces
Allied forces captured upto “Sidi Barrani” by 10 Dec 1940 and pursued Axis forces. They advanced upto Agheila,  around 600 miles inside Libya.

Figure-14: Military Battles-Advance of Allied Forces

Arrival of Rommel and Advance of Axis Forces
General Rommel reached Libya on 12 February 1941 and his Africa corps  completed reaching North Africa by March 1941.He than started his advance eastward in march 1941 and pushed Allied forces. By June 41, he captured up to Sollum, an area on the border inside Egypt.

Figure-15: Military Battles-Arrival of Rommel and Advance of Axis Forces

Retreat of Rommel
After the retreat of Allied forces in 3rd week of June 1941, General Wavell was replaced by Gen Auchinlek as Commander in Chief of that theatre. In November 1941, a series of offensive and counter offensive against Axis forces. In November and December 1941. Allied started their fresh offensive against Axis forces. In November and December 1941, a series of offensive and counter offensive took place around and in between Tobruk to Sollum. By the end of December 1941,Rommel was pushed back upto Agedabia, approximately 100 miles north-west of Agheila.

Figure-16: Military Battles-Retreat of Rommel

Fresh and 2nd Advance of Rommel
In January 1942, Gen Rommel started his fresh advance east ward. After series of offensive launched at Benghazi, Gazala, Tobruk and Marsa Matruh pushing the Allied forces. Rommel reached El-Alamien 60 miles east of Alexandria by the end of June 1942.

Figure-17: Military Battles-Fresh and 2nd Advance of Rommel

First Battle of El-Alamien
After their retreat, the Allied forces took up defense at EL-Alamein to save Egypt from falling into the hands of Rommel. In July 1942, Rommel launched several attack on Allied defense at Alamein but failed.

Figure-18: Military Battles-First Battle of El-Alamien

Battle of Alam El Halfa
In August 1942, General Alexander replaced General Aucninleck as commander in Chief. General Gott also took over 8th Army, but due to his death on next day by an air crash, General Montgomery took over 8th Army. With the intention  of breaking the Allied defence line. Rommel launched attack on Alam Halfa Ridge behind defence line on 30 August 1942, but failed due to lack of logistics. then rommel quickly took up  defence in EL-Alamein line facing the allied defense.

Figure-19: Military Battles-Battle of Alam El Halfa

Rommel’s Concept of Battle and Defense Plan

Planning Consideration
Field Marshal Rommel, who is also known as "Desert Fox" brought a number of axis victory through mobile warfare in the desert. But under following compulsion Rommel opted for static form of defense in El-Alamein.

Under Strength of Motorized Unit
Number of motorized units Rommel had were far below than Allied. More so, the reinforcement which were coming in were also mostly non-motorized. So, they could only have a role to play in static defense.

Allied Superiority in Armour
Allied enjoyed 2.5x1 armour superiority.

Air Supremacy of Allied Forces
The Allied forces enjoyed 3.5 x 1 air supremacy thus Allied forces would make motorized column of Axis forces helpless and vulnerable.

Acute Shortage of POL
The acute shortage of POL restricted wide scale movement of tanks and vehicles across desert, which is most vital for any mobile warfare. On the contrary, he could save POL through static def which could be used to disengage and moving away troops during TRD if possible.

Acute Shortage of Ammunition
After the Battle of Alam Halfa Axis did not receive adequate C Supply. They were running acute shortage of all types of ammunition which forced Rommel to undertake static defense.

Concept of Operation

So, Rommel knew that his resources would not permit to integrate a TRD plan with his overall def plan. Therefore, he concentrated on making up a strong position defense to repel enemy break through on following basis :

a.      Defense location had to be well developed and held at any cost. Thus reducing enemy strength through process of attrition.

b.      Any penetration to be halted and repulsed by launching Counter attack with mobile reserve held at the back.

c.      Position defense should be fully integrated with natural and artificial obstacles.

Axis Defense

a.      Minefield.    A huge belt of defensive minefield was laid along the whole front of no man's land. Some 5,00,000 mines mostly antitank were laid to stop en tanks. The minefield was further strengthened by the use of captured British Shells/bombs fitted with electronic detonating system.

b.      Out Posts.       A no of lightly held outposts were sited within the minefield. They were provided with tracking dogs. Their task was to provide Early Warning of allied breaching effort and direct fire on to them.

c.      Main Defense.          It was located 1-2 thousand yards west of minefield. It has an average depth of 3,000 yards. Non motorized units were used to held the main defensive position. They also had protective minefields all around. Main defensive position was organized into 3 sectors. Disposition of various sectors were as follow:

(1)    Northern Sector.

164 German Division.

Trento Italian Division.

(2)    Central Sector.

Italian Bologna Division.

Italian Brescia Division.

(3)    Southern Sector.

Italian Folgore Division.

Italian Pavia Division.

Figure-20: Military Battles-Axis Defense

d.      Mobile Reserve.  It consisted of Panzer Divisions and Italian Armoured Divisions. They were concentrating behind main defensive position to mainly Counter attack and destroy enemy penetration. Their guns were also tasked to strengthen Defensive Fire power of main defensive position. Disposition of various formations in this case was as under:

(1)    For Northern Sector

15 Panzer Division.

Italian Littorio Division.

(2)    For Central and Southern Sector

21 Panzer Division.

Italian Ariete Division.

e.      Central Mobile Reserve. Following formations were kept in central reserve of PANZER ARMEE AFRICA.

(1)    90 German Light Division.

(2)    1´German Flak Division.

(3)    1´Italian Trieste Division.

f.       Line of Communication.   Axis defense relied on a supply route which ran along the coast towards west. The primary supply base was at Tobruk while Bengazi remained a far away supply base in case Tobruk fall in enemy's hand.

Montgomery's Concept of Battle

Since it was not possible to outflank, the consideration of punching a hole in the enemy's position to break in was prime importance.

Dispatch of corps strong in armour through the hole into the enemy territory to break out.

Thereafter develop operations to destroy Rommel's forces.

Since armour can't break through the enemy defense, it would have to be primarily and infantry battle.

Montgomery's Final Plan

Attack Plan.      On 06 October 1942 the 8th Army command gave out his final plan for the operation code named "Light Foot" salient features of the plan are as follow:

a.      Main thrust.     By 30 Corps to the north to take place between Tell El Eisa and Mitteira ridge area. Attack would be in a narrow front of 6-7 miles keeping 04x Divisions in front. This corps was to establish brH behind en main defense upto "Line Oxalic". They would then prepare two corridors through minefields and through these lanes 10th corps was to pass.

b.      Secondary thrust.     By 13 corps in the south was to stage two attacks. One would be directed against Himeimat feature while the other one against Jebel Kalakh feature. These attacks were to be made with the primary objective of misleading the enemy and thereby containing forces that might otherwise be used against 30th corps to the north.

c.      Both the above corps were to destroy the enemy holding the forward positions.

d.      Armour Thrust.      10th Corps was to pass through corridor and deploy them in "Line Pierson" west of "Oxalic". They would protect 30 corps from enemy interference. And its final objective was the destruction of the enemy's armour.

e.      The attack was to start at night of 23/24 October with full moon.

Artillery Plan.      Artillery would first carry out CB on axis battery positions. After that they would switch to main defensive position and neutralize enemy position by artillery concentration. Total about 1200 guns of different Caliber were used for opening battle.

Air Plan.  They would at first augment CB efforts of Artillery by engaging enemy gun position. Later they would switch over to enemy armour concentration and destroy them.

Deception Plan/ Cover Plan.      Allied forces knew that a strategic surprise was impossible as enemy was sanguine of Allied attack. So the planners concentrated on concealing weight, direction, time and place of attack in order to achieve tactical surprise. As such a cover plan was drawn up as follows:

a.         Concealment of Concentration.

(1)    The SO worked out complete layout of the battle front of the day of the attack. Then dummy vehicles were used to achieve the density of vehicles require for the assault 2-3 weeks before. As concentration of troops and vehicles progressed the dummy vehicles were replaced with real one and all taking place at night. Similarly at the hours of darkness some special dummy vehicles were made under which guns were concealed. Thereby enemy air photo failed to notice any significant change on the battle field.

(2)    Serious control was exercised on forward movements.

(3)    Tanks were camouflaged as trucks and fake tanks were prepared to mislead the enemy about armour concentration.

(4)    Slit trenches were dug at night and camouflaged about a month before. They were later used to conceal troops as they arrived into the front line.

b.       Deceive Enemy about Direction of Attack.         Following steps were taken to simulate attack on southern side:

(1)    Dummy dumping was carried out. 5 mile dummy railway lines, 20 mile pipe lines and water installation were constructed in the southern front.

(2)    A false WS channel representing movement of armour division to the south was launched.

(3)    In the north movements was strictly controlled while in south it was encouraged.

c.       Deceive Enemy about Time of Attack.     The construction of pipe line progressed in such a manner that its completion would take 2-3 weeks after the time of attack. As such axis would be mislead to guess about the time of Allied attack.

d.       Allure Enemy to Commit Reserve.    A feint amphibious landing was planned to take place at enemy's rear from the sea 04 hours after attack had started. This way, it was expected that enemy would commit portion of its reserve to deal with this. To materialize this plan, a convoy set off from Alexandria at 1600 hours on 23 October 1942.

OPERATION LIGHT FOOT

Plan.   Break in phase of Allied offensive at EI Alamein was given code name ‘Light Foot’. Montgomery planned to destroy Rommel’s inf formations first and then the Armoured forces. He employ his armour to hold Rommel’s armour while his Infantry formation were being destroyed. The plan was as under:
a.        The Allied to attack the axis defense simultaneously on both the flanks.
b.        The main attack was to be launched by 30 corps in the north, to breach two corridors through the Axis defense and minefields.
c.         10 corps was to pass through these corridors and capture important ground astride Axis supply route.
d.         In the south, 13 corps was to break into the enemy position and advance with 7 Armoured Division to draw Rommel’s armour thereby maintain balance of force.
e.         The RAF was to gain air supremacy before the commencement of battle and support land operations.
Execution.
a.         Break in Phase (23-24 Oct 1942).
(1)       Operation ‘Light Foot’ began with artillery barrage at 2140 hours on 23 October 1942.
(2)       On the north, 30 Corps with four divisions (9 AUS, 51 HL, 2 NZ and 1 SA) launched attack and established two corridors.
(3)       On the south, 13 Corps launched two attacks and was held up between the minefield but was successful in keeping 21 Panzer in its sector.
(4)       On 24 October 1942, by dawn most of the units of 30 Corps reached their ‘Oxalic line’ objective.



(5)       On 24 October 1942, 10 Corps advanced with 1 and 10 Armoured Division and moved through northern and southern corridor respectively. But 10 Corps was unable to clear the brH.
Figure-21: Military Battles-Break in Phase

b.         Dog Fight Phase (24 - 30 October 1942).

(1)       On 24 October 1942, 1 Armoured Division and 51 Highland Division advanced through northern corridor and achieved Breakout.

(2)       10 Armoured Division and 2 NZ Division attack through the southern corridor and breakout was achieved after a delay.

(3)       Counter attack by 15 Panzer Division was bounced back, 15 Panzer losing 88 out of 119 tanks.

(4)       Shifting the weight of the attack Montgomery asked 9 AUS Division to attacked north-west towards Rahman tr. 1 Armour Division could not advance beyond kidney Ridge.

(5)       On 27 October 1942, Montgomery decided to regroup. 2 NZ Divisions was replaced by 1 SA and 4 IND Division. 7 Armoured Division from 13 Corps brought to North.

(6)       Two German tankers were sunk. Fuel shortage of Panzer Army became acute.

(7)       Further attack by 9 AUS Division in the north drove a wedge into the enemy position by 28/29 October.

(8)       On 30/31 October, AUS Division continued its attempt to cut off the enemy forces in coastal salient.

(9)       Operation Light Foot ended and failed to breach a major portion of Rommel’s defense. Montgomery decided to readjust his plan and code named it operation ‘Supercharge’.

Figure-22: Military Battles-Dog Fight Phase

OPERATION SUPER CHARGE

General.     The breakout phase of the offensive operation of the Allied was given code name ‘Super Charge’. This involved fresh re-grouping of forces and could not be launched before Night 01/02 November 1942.

Plan.

a.         30 Corps.      Launch Night attack westwards, hold flanks of the corridor and provide a Fire Base for further offensive operation.

b.         10 Corps.      Breakout through brH created by 30 Corps. Exploit success towards north-west and cut off enemy supply route. Be prepare to fight way through Rommel’s forces in case 30 Corps failed to establish brH.

Execution.

a.         Operation Super Charge commenced on 02 November 1942.

b.         On 02 November, 1 Armoured Division advance but was held up by hy Antitank fire. A furious battle of tank engagement was fought between 1 Armoured Division with Rommel’s 15 Panzer and LITTORIO Armoured Division.  1 Armoured Division moved through to eliminate the opposition.

c.         At Night on 03 November 1942, 1 SA and 4 IND Division achieved breakthrough in the southern corridor forcing back Axis screen.

d.    On 04 November 1942, after further fighting Axis troops finally began to retreat along the coast road which was followed by 1, 7 and 10 Armoured Divisions.
Figure-23: Military Battles-OPERATION SUPER CHARGE


Causes of Axis Defeat

Axis Inferiority in Strength.         Axis inferiority in strength in terms of fighting troops, armour, guns, air craft was one of the main contributing factor to their defeat.

Inferiority of Weapon and Equipment.        Axis weapon and equipment were mostly of inferior quality than the Allied ones. Their artillery and tank guns both had shorter range than that of the Allied. Moreover Italian weapon, equipment and armament were of further inferior quality.

Lack of Logistic Back Up.          Rommel was short of all forms of supply. During the month of September/ October sup reduced to 40% of the minimum essential requirement.

Lack of Air Support.         The Axis forces were operating against a massive superior allied air force. This had caused serious limitations on the mobility of the Axis forces.

Positional Defense.      The Axis had advantage in training and command experience in mobile warfare. But because of overwhelming allied superiority both on ground and in air, they had to adopt a positional defense. It was of a definite disadvantage to them.

Insecure and Overstretched Line of Communication.      Constant bombing by the Allied air force made both the land and sea Line of Communication extremely insecure. 500 miles long Line of Communication from Bengazi was a very long distance for the Axis to cover with fewer vehicles under enemy air interruption.

Shortage of Artillery Ammunition.   Because of shortage of artillery ammunition, General Stumme, who was in Axis command on the day the Allied offensive commenced, did not authorized opening of artillery guns, which could probably have caused considerable damage to the Allied forces.

Inferior Fighting Quality of the Italians.            Italians in North Africa never fought with determination. Their morale was already low before this battle and it became worse with inadequate supply thereafter.

Poor Intelligence and Foresightness.       The Axis Commander General Stumme failed to gain information or anticipate the weight, date and time and direction of Allied main and secondary thrusts. As a result Axis were surprised.

Absence of Rommel.         In the opening of offensive Rommel was in Europe being sick. Stumme who conducted the battle initially did not know as to how Rommel planned to fight the defensive battle. On the first day Stumme died and Rommel had to conduct the battle in a difficult situation.

Cover Plan.  Montgomery's cover plan was materialized and achieved complete tactical surprise regarding time and direction of attack.

Lessons Learnt

a.         Aim.    Aim must be kept in mind throughout to win a battle. In spite of difficulties in the north, Allied did not shift the weight of attack south as they aimed to cut off the coast road along Mediterranean.

b.         Morale. Leadership, equipment and training built up the morale which helped the 8th Army achieving victory. On the other hand, Italian’s morale on the Axis side was always low and they could never fight with determination.

c.         Aggressive Action.      Aggressive action brings victory in a battle. Despite difficulties, Allied always exerted pressure on the enemy in all sectors through assault on enemy position, indirect fire by artillery, air action, raid and aggressive patrolling.

d.         Surprise. Surprise always plays a big part in any attack. Though it was not possible for the Allied forces to achieve strategic surprise, but an elaborate cover plan to deceive the enemy about the weight, time and direction of attack helped achieving complete tactical surprise.

e.         Concentration. Concentration of superior force is of utmost importance for success in battle. Allied concentration of force, was so great that the Axis had no match to it.

f.          Flexibility. Flexibility in planning and execution always brings fruit. Allied plans were sound and flexible. Due to flexible planning, on 27 October Rommel could shift 7 Armoured Division from 13 Corps to 30 Corps to fight in threatened northern front.

g.         Synchronization.    Synchronization is a prerequisite for a successful campaign. All action must be synchronized and for that cooperation amongst the services is very important. Allied forces improved cooperation amongst sister services through several exercises and coordination thereby all their action was synchronized.

h.         Administration and Logistics. Sound administration and logistics system is a must for any military operation.  Axis forces suffered heavy due to poor logistic backup.  No amount of bravery and training can compensate for lack of supply particularly weapons, ammunition, POL etc.

j.          Security.      Security is an important aspect for winning a battle. The plan of the attack was not discussed to the troops till last moment. No Visitors were allowed in 8th Army area from 8 October. Line of Communication of 8 Army was also secured. The forward movement of the men and material were done under the cover of darkness through concealed routes.

No comments:

Post a Comment